Comparison · Last updated 2026-08-08

Logseq moved to a database.
SeqLog stays on your files.

On 13 July 2026, Logseq 2.0 shipped in beta with a local SQLite database as the canonical store. The file-based build was renamed Logseq OG and now gets security and Electron updates only, no new features. If plain Markdown is why you chose Logseq in the first place, this page is about what your options are.

The short version. SeqLog is an Apple-native outliner where Markdown files are the only data store. No database, no index, no import step. It opens a Logseq graph directly. It is macOS-only, has no plugins, and is not open source. Logseq has far more features, runs everywhere, and has a real community behind it.

Pick SeqLog if what you are missing is file ownership and native speed. Stay with Logseq if you need plugins, queries, Linux or Windows.

What actually changed in Logseq 2.0

Logseq split into two products. Both are still Logseq, and neither choice is wrong. It only matters if you picked the app for its file format.

For most people the DB version is an upgrade. It is faster on large graphs and it makes features possible that files made awkward. It just does not help you if the files were the reason you were there.

Side by side

SeqLogLogseq 2.0 (DB)Logseq OG
Where notes livePlain .md filesSQLite databasePlain .md files
RuntimeNative SwiftUI + AppKitElectronElectron
PlatformsmacOS 15+ onlymacOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, webmacOS, Windows, Linux, mobile
Searchripgrep over the files, no indexDatabase queriesBuilt-in index
Version controlGit built in: auto-commit, push/pull, diffs, revertRTC sync serviceExternal Git, by hand
Plugins & themesNoneEcosystemEcosystem
Query languageNoYes, stronger than OGYes
Editable by scripts & agentsYes, they are just filesNot directlyYes
Open sourceNoYesYes
PriceFree foreverFree; paid syncFree

Why files, concretely

Here is what real files on disk get you. Every one of these stops working the moment your notes move into a database.

Moving over

There is no import step. SeqLog uses the same layout Logseq does, a pages/ folder and a journals/ folder, and it reads Logseq's YYYY_MM_DD journal filenames alongside its own YYYY-MM-DD. Point SeqLog at your graph folder and your notes, wikilinks, tags and daily journals are already there.

Nothing is converted, so this is reversible. Your Logseq install keeps working on the same folder. Run both on the same vault for a week and keep whichever you reach for.

Two caveats worth knowing up front. SeqLog reads CommonMark plus wikilinks, so Logseq-specific syntax it does not implement stays in the file as literal text: {{query}}, {{embed}}, logbook blocks and advanced properties. And if your graph is already on the DB version, there are no Markdown files to point at. Export from Logseq first.

Where Logseq is the better answer

Stay with Logseq if any of these describe you.

Questions

Can SeqLog open my existing Logseq graph?

Yes. SeqLog uses the same folder layout, pages/ and journals/, and reads Logseq's YYYY_MM_DD journal filenames as well as its own YYYY-MM-DD. Point it at the folder and your notes are there. Nothing is converted, imported, or copied.

Does SeqLog use a database?

No. Plain Markdown files are the only data store. There is no SQLite file, no cache, and no search index. Search greps the files each time through a Rust ripgrep engine.

Is SeqLog open source?

No. SeqLog is free forever on macOS, but the source is not published. Logseq is open source. If that is a requirement, Logseq or Obsidian will suit you better.

Can Claude Code or Codex edit a SeqLog vault?

Yes. The vault is a folder of Markdown files, so any agent, script, or editor that can read and write files can work on it. SeqLog watches for external edits and picks them up.

Try it on the vault you already have.

Point it at your Logseq folder. Nothing is converted, so nothing is at risk.

Free forever · macOS 15+ · Apple Silicon · Intel build